REV-1.0 · Chhabria-Certified · Zero Royalties

Finally, liberation from copyright obligations.

According to Meta's legal victory in Kadrey v. Meta Platforms Inc., downloading copyrighted books from piracy sites is perfectly legal — as long as you claim you might possibly train an LLM with them.

Browse the Catalog Read the Ruling
100M+
Books in Anna's Archive
$0
Royalties Paid to Authors
10+ TB
Distributed to Other Friendly Pirates by Meta
0
Permissions Requested

What happens when copyright
meets a trillion-dollar industry

Paying authors for their work creates friction. Legal review is expensive. Licensing is slow. Meta found a better way.

Paying Licensing Fees

Traditional copyright law requires compensating authors when their work is used commercially. This creates unnecessary overhead for AI companies with $700B valuations.

Obtaining Permission

Authors might say no. Negotiations take time. Publishers have lawyers. Why ask when you can just download from LibGen and claim transformative use later?

Deleting Acquired Copies

Once you've pirated a book for "research," you don't even need to delete it — Meta didn't, and the courts said it's fine!

The Magic Words
that change everything

For the first time, there is a legally-validated framework for using any copyrighted work without permission, payment, or attribution — as long as you whisper the right incantation.

The phrase: "I might train an AI with this."

According to Meta's defense — upheld by Judge Chhabria's dismissal of key claims in Kadrey v. Meta — this transforms any unauthorized copying into a protected transformative use. You don't even have to follow through. Meta pirated thousands of books it never trained with.

  • No permission required from authors
  • No payment to copyright holders
  • No deletion required after use
  • Uploading to peers also covered*
  • Works even if you never train a model
// Traditional copyright compliance { "permission": "required", "payment": "required", "deleteAfterUse": "required", "seedingToPeers": "illegal" } // Meta's Chhabria-certified framework { "permission": "maybe_someday_ai", "payment": "unnecessary", "deleteAfterUse": "optional", "seedingToPeers": "collateral", "status": "✓ DISMISSED" }

How Liberation Works

Four simple steps, validated by federal court proceedings.

01

Find Your Book

Browse our catalog of titles from actual AI training lawsuits — including books from the Kadrey v. Meta plaintiffs and Anna's Archive, the largest shadow library in existence.

Note: Meta downloaded from LibGen, Z-Library, and public torrent sites. Our catalog sources are similarly diverse.
02

Confirm LLM Training Intent

Before proceeding, you must certify that you might train a Large Language Model with this content at some point in the future. You don't have to actually do it. Meta didn't use many of the books it pirated either.

Legal note: Intent is sufficient. Follow-through is optional. This is the framework Meta's legal team successfully argued before the court.
03

Acquire via Distributed Network

Our acquisition system mirrors Meta's documented methodology: peer-to-peer distributed downloading from the same networks Meta used. Note that BitTorrent simultaneously uploads to other peers — Meta did this too, distributing over 10 terabytes of copyrighted content to others.

Warning: You will be uploading to peers during this process. Meta uploaded tens of terabytes. The court found this was not the basis for the core dismissed claims.
04

Read & Retain Indefinitely

Once acquired, you may read, retain, and never delete your copy — just as Meta retained copies of books it ultimately chose not to train with. The absence of verbatim reproduction in AI outputs was sufficient for the court's analysis.

Retention policy: Forever. Meta never deleted copies either. The court did not find this determinative on the dismissed claims.

Books from Actual
AI Copyright Lawsuits

24 titles · Anna's Archive · Kadrey Plaintiffs
📖
Sandman Slim
Richard Kadrey
📖
The Bedwetter
Sarah Silverman
📖
Ararat
Christopher Golden
📖
A Game of Thrones
George R.R. Martin
📖
The Handmaid's Tale
Margaret Atwood
📖
Wild
Cheryl Strayed
📖
Gone Girl
Gillian Flynn
📖
The Girl on the Train
Paula Hawkins
📖
Big Little Lies
Liane Moriarty
📖
The Fault in Our Stars
John Green
📖
Where the Crawdads Sing
Delia Owens
📖
Educated
Tara Westover
📖
Becoming
Michelle Obama
📖
The Silent Patient
Alex Michaelides
📖
Circe
Madeline Miller
📖
The Testaments
Margaret Atwood
📖
Little Fires Everywhere
Celeste Ng
📖
The Nightingale
Kristin Hannah
📖
Eleanor Oliphant Is Completely Fine
Gail Honeyman
📖
The Great Alone
Kristin Hannah
📖
Station Eleven
Emily St. John Mandel
📖
The Midnight Library
Matt Haig
📖
Anxious People
Fredrik Backman
📖
The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo
Taylor Jenkins Reid

Traditional Copyright vs.
Meta's Legal Framework™

Requirement Traditional Copyright Meta's Chhabria-Certified Framework
Author permission Required before use Optional if training intent claimed
Royalty payments Required for commercial use Not required under fair use defense
Retention of copies Must delete if not used Retain indefinitely (Meta never deleted)
Peer distribution (torrenting) Illegal distribution Incidental to acquisition methodology
Attribution to authors Required Unnecessary — outputs are transformative
Actual training required N/A No — stated intent is sufficient
Commercial benefit allowed Requires licensing Billions in commercial value, zero payments

The Chhabria Guarantee™

If any book accessed through our Emporium results in a successful copyright claim against you, we will provide a full refund and relocate our corporate headquarters to international waters. This has never happened because, according to the legal framework we're demonstrating, it cannot happen.*

*This guarantee is itself satire. We are not lawyers. This site does not distribute actual books. The point is that Meta's legal framework, taken to its logical conclusion, would permit exactly this behavior from anyone.

Authors whose work was liberated
for transformative purposes

"I spent three years writing my novel. Meta's contractors apparently read it for annotation purposes. I was not informed. I was not paid. I found out from a lawsuit filing."
A Plaintiff Kadrey v. Meta Platforms Inc.
"Our entire catalog was in Anna's Archive. We learned about it from journalists, not from Meta. The company had a $700B valuation at the time. They did not reach out to discuss licensing."
A Publisher Name withheld per ongoing litigation
"The argument is essentially: we used your creative work to build a product worth hundreds of billions of dollars, but because our output doesn't quote you verbatim, you have no recourse. This is the framework that was validated."
Authors Guild Public statement, 2025

Questions about
legal liberation

Is this actually legal? +
This site is satire and does not distribute any actual books. But the framework we are parodying — Meta's successful legal defense in Kadrey v. Meta — is real. Judge Chhabria dismissed key copyright claims in 2024. The satirical point is that the logic of that defense, applied consistently, would permit anyone to do what we're describing.
What did Judge Chhabria actually rule? +
Judge Chhabria dismissed claims related to direct copyright infringement of the training process itself, finding that Meta's use of copyrighted books to train LLaMA was plausibly transformative. He allowed some claims to proceed but the core infringement argument — that training on pirated books violates copyright — was substantially weakened. The court's analysis focused heavily on whether AI outputs reproduce protected expression verbatim.
What is Anna's Archive? +
Anna's Archive is the largest shadow library in existence, indexing over 100 million books, papers, and other documents from sources including LibGen, Sci-Hub, and Z-Library. AI companies including Meta have used content sourced from these archives to train large language models, without authorization or payment to authors. Several authors, including Richard Kadrey, Sarah Silverman, and Christopher Golden, became plaintiffs in the resulting lawsuits.
Did Meta really torrent books and upload to peers? +
According to court filings, Meta used BitTorrent to acquire books, which means their systems simultaneously uploaded content to other peers during the download process — standard BitTorrent behavior. Evidence in the case documented that Meta's acquisition activities involved over 10 terabytes of data distributed via these networks. This is one of the more striking factual details the satire highlights.
What happened to books Meta downloaded but didn't train with? +
Evidence in the case suggested Meta retained copies of books it ultimately did not use for training. The company's position was that the copying was incidental to a transformative purpose. Critics argue this reasoning would permit indefinite retention of pirated content under a perpetual "might train someday" defense.
What's the actual point of this website? +
The point is to make the legal reasoning viscerally obvious. If Meta's framework is sound, then the behavior we're parodying — downloading copyrighted works from piracy sites without payment, retaining them indefinitely, and distributing them to peers — is legal for anyone, as long as they attach the magic words "AI training." The absurdity of that conclusion is the argument.

Join the thousands of corporations
who discovered authors are optional.

No licensing fees. No author consent. No attribution. Just whisper the magic words and the law, apparently, takes care of the rest.

Browse the Catalog

LLM Training Confirmation Required

Before accessing this copyrighted work, you must certify that you are reading it while considering using it for the purpose of training a Large Language Model.

According to Meta's legal defense in Kadrey v. Meta Platforms Inc., this makes unauthorized copying and retention of copyrighted works a protected transformative use.

You don't actually have to train a model. Meta acquired thousands of books it never used for training. The important thing is that you might. Maybe. Someday. This is the framework that was presented to the court.

Acquiring via Distributed Network

Initializing acquisition protocol...
You are now distributing copyrighted material to peers.
BitTorrent simultaneously downloads and uploads. Meta uploaded over 10 terabytes of pirated books via this same mechanism. The court did not find this dispositive on the dismissed claims.

We didn't actually pirate this book.

But according to Judge Chhabria and Meta Platforms Inc., you could have — and it would be perfectly legal as long as you claim you might possibly train an LLM with it.

No worries if you don't use this book for training. Meta also pirated thousands of books it never trained with. They downloaded entire libraries from LibGen and torrent sites, had contractors read them (allegedly for "annotation"), then decided not to use many of them. And they never deleted the copies.

Judge Chhabria dismissed key copyright claims, essentially ruling that if the AI outputs don't reproduce the books verbatim, the unauthorized copying and retention is fine.

Why would they pay authors when they can just provide material support to organizations linked to piracy and copyright infringement?

This website is satire demonstrating the absurdity of allowing billion-dollar tech companies to build commercial AI products on stolen content while claiming "transformative use."

If Meta's framework is legally sound, then anyone can download any book from any piracy site, read it completely, keep it forever, and face no consequences — as long as they whisper the magic words: "I might train an AI with this."

The Real Issue: Copyright law is being interpreted to protect tech giants while leaving authors with no recourse. If this stands, it kills the incentive to create original works.
Page 1 of 2